Talk:Lawrence Brockett

Lawrence vs Laurence

The spelling of the name of Lawrence Brockett is confirmed by these sites:

From other (non-Internet) information, I also believe that the w spelling is correct

I sent an email to the Thomas Gray Archive...

Thank you for your e-mail.

> Hi. Can you please help me, I was gathering information about Laurence > Brockett (as it is spelled on your website). However other information > sources give the name ad Lawrence Brockett. Can you please help me out > and confirm whether the name is Laurence or Lawrence ?
We have found both spellings, "Lawrence" seems common in pre-20th century literature, while "Laurence" is generally used in later works. Although we have not checked this against any original resources, we have opted to go for the version generally used in bio-bibliographical databases and secondary literature today.
Kind regards,
A Huber. -- A Huber, MA Editor, _The Thomas Gray Archive_ http://www.thomasgray.org/

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lawrence Brockett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813111535/http://www.headlamhall.co.uk/history.htm to http://www.headlamhall.co.uk/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]