User talk:Slavik0329

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I have changed the spelling of Logarhythms in the article about MIT back to what it was, because this is a group of a cappella singers, whose name is an obvious pun. Michael Hardy 22:24, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dynatac.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dynatac.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image tagging for Image:CIMG1106 (Small).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:CIMG1106 (Small).JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mhslogo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mhslogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to iPhone 3G S. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. You edited a section to say that something 'could be fixed with a simple software upgrade'. Scott (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Russian obsession

The article Russian obsession has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure original research, with no citations and no likelihood of any.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Korruski (talk) 21:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]