Jump to content

Talk:Legislative Council of Hong Kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Table

[edit]

Can someone make a small table, listing the parties and the number of seats for each party, and marking them according to political blocs (pro-Beijing or pro-democracy)? Thanks. -- Kaihsu 10:34, 2004 Jul 2 (UTC)

Chamber

[edit]

Any chance of a picture inside the chamber?

Reorganising subnational legislature categories

[edit]

This article is listed under Category:Dependency legislatures. It is proposed to either merge this category with Category:Legislatures of subnational entities by reassigning the categories OR to make it a subcategory of Legislatures of subnational entities. To contribute to the discussion, please go to: Category talk:Dependency legislatures Adz 08:12, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

actually, the more I think about it, I think it would be better just to make it a subcategory, because dependencies are a special type of subnational entity, and it would prevent the other category from getting cluttered in future. Adz 08:12, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Update Needed

[edit]

it would be important to note that in 2004 there was an addition election and that now 30 members are directly elected while 30 are from functional constituencies. There are no longer members selected by an election committee.

Infobox

[edit]

@Lmmnhn: According to Appledaily, Stand news and Now TV, the pan-democracy camp and the localist forms a camp called 'Democracy camp' while the Democracy camp and Centrist who are pro-Democracy forms a camp called 'Anti-establishment camp'. I think these are crystal clear and I really don't know what you don't understand about it Elhk2047 (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas 2601:380:8400:7FD0:C03B:ADC0:45D0:958B (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 May 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 02:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative Council of Hong Kong → Legislative Council of the HKSAR – I'm puzzled by another editor's reversion of my page move. The Legislative Council of Hong Kong existed between 1843 and 1997. The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) differs, as shown in the first line and paragraph of the headnotes. If the label differs, why not have wiki reflect reality? The past and present legislatures not only serve a different purpose, they serve a different master. Even the buildings used are different: old plaque inscription address versus new building and its wikimedia page. This is an uncontroversial request for a page move, as I indicated in my original move. Magnovvig (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Object to speedy move It seems someone already objected since the move was reverted. Thus a discussion should be opened. From your rationale, it would seem that a split is in order to split off Colonial Hong Kong (ie. Colony of Victoria) from the SAR. -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 11:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, and they failed to explain their rationale. I suggest a move to HKSAR **because that's what it is**. That's what the Chinese call it. The old Hong Kong died in 1997. wiki is an encyclopedia, not a political hobby horse. Magnovvig (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Everyone calls this city "Hong Kong" in English. Here is an ngram. If you are into officialese, you can keep going with this. The full name of the council is "Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China." Allan Rice (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    But this article isn't about the city. This article is about the government. The British colonial government was known as Legislative Council of Hong Kong. The PRC colonial government is known as the Legislative Council of HKSAR. These are different animals. They need different pages. Magnovvig (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggesting a SNOW close since this is just a general designation, and pretty nobody outside Greater China would know what HKSAR really stands for. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 10:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that "nobody outside Greater China would know what HKSAR really stands for" is precisely why wiki must educate and inform everybody outside the PRC. Magnovvig (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Even though the two Legislative Councils are different from each other (the one under the British and under the PRC), the current one grew out of the previous. I feel that there is a sense of continuity from before the handover to now and therefore it could be argued that it's the same organ under different management. I think it is appropriate to keep it as it is and have headings to describe its development. Kdm852 (talk) 11:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, the current one didn't grow out of the former one. They both existed during 1995-1997. The current one usurped the one former one. Magnovvig (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - WP:COMMONNAME, suggest a WP:SNOW close--17jiangz1 (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Common name of Hong Kong is Hong Kong. Derived article should follow the same format. Matthew hk (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    This is no discussion about Hong Kong the city. This is a discussion about the Legislative Council. The PRC knows the thing as "LegCo of HKSAR" 1998-present. The British knew it as "LegCo of Hong Kong" 1843-1997. Do you seek intentionally to obliterate history? If so, why? What is your purpose? Magnovvig (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Have you actually looked at the article? The history section starts in 1843. That's a lot of background information if you think the group was created in 1995. Allan Rice (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    You misunderstand me. If you read the article the PRC HKSAR body was created in 1995, to prime the pump for the takeover of Hong Kong, which they then termed HKSAR. The body created 1843 was British, and they called the colony "Hong Kong" and gave their colony a government which included the LegCo of Hong Kong. We are talking about two different bodies, and they deserve two different pages. Have I cleared away your confusion adequately now? Magnovvig (talk) 22:42, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Here is the NGram of @Allan Rice: As you can see, there is a definite difference in search terms input by the public. We should follow the public since they obviously are searching for different information. I think a clarification like: "see also|Legislative Council of HKSAR" if you seek the legislative body that came into existence in 1995; "see also|Legislative Council of Hong Kong" if you seek the legislative body which ceased to exist in 1997. Hong Kong is now a province of the PRC and wiki looks foolish if it doesn't reflect reality. There's no sense living in the past, much as one would like to tromp around in pith helmets and khaki short pants. Magnovvig (talk) 22:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ngram does a search of the Google books corpus. For data on search terms, you can look at Google Trends. In this case, neither of the relevant terms are common enough to yield a meaningful result. Allan Rice (talk) 01:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RM use ngram instead of google trend, as the latter is user-generated content. And the ngram already shown "Legislative Council of Hong Kong" is more popular than "Legislative Council of the HKSAR". Matthew hk (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Magnovvig, you are the nominator of the RM. So your keep vote is duplicated. Or you can simply say you withdrew the nomination. Matthew hk (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. OceanHok (talk) 04:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:COMMONNAME doesn't get at the root of the problem. We see on WP:COMMONNAME: "People" like Bill Clinton (not: William Jefferson Clinton), "Places" like Germany (not: Deutschland), and Spanish flu (not: 1918 influenza pandemic). We don't see addressed on WP:COMMONNAME the particular need for disambiguation: "see also|Legislative Council of HKSAR" if you seek the legislative body that came into existence in 1995; "see also|Legislative Council of Hong Kong" if you seek the legislative body which ceased to exist in 1997. Typically, if Bill Clinton had a son named Bill Clinton, we would distinguish the two by adding the post-nominal suffix "II" to the son's name. Here in this case it's difficult to follow suit, except by referring to the former by "... Hong Kong" and the latter by "... HKSAR". Magnovvig (talk) 07:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am sure readers are looking for information about the current parliament instead of the old colonial parliament when they input the search term "Legislative Council of Hong Kong". OceanHok (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I see a lot of opposes citing WP:COMMONNAME. I think what the proposer is trying to get at is that the difference between the colonial Legislative Council and the SAR LegCo is like the difference between the Parliament of Great Britain and the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The legislatures remain the same chambers in both cases, but the political entities they legislated for changed significantly after 1801 and 1997. The distinctiveness of the post-1997 Legislative Council is emphasized in Chinese with a different translation from the colonial chamber (立法局 → 立法會). On the other hand, the UK Parliament article isn't split between pre-1922 and post-1922 articles. It seems like what the mover is proposing should be a split instead of a move. I don't feel strongly about either way, so I'm leaving this as just a comment. Horserice (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: per WP:COMMONNAME. MatryoshkaNL (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence in Lead

[edit]

"Following the large-scale protest, the National People's Congress has full legislative power over Hong Kong..." What is this supposed to mean? I don't believe the NPC has replaced the LegCo. CurryCity (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hong Kong Parliament Electoral organising committee" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hong Kong Parliament Electoral organising committee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Hong Kong Parliament Electoral organising committee until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. JaventheAldericky (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Legislative_Council_of_Hong_Kong&oldid=1208135833"