Talk:Graffiti

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Graffiti article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 45 days

Graffiti is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 18, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 24, 2004	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
February 4, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
December 6, 2005	Featured article review	Kept
May 16, 2006	Featured article review	Demoted
October 16, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
October 24, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Former featured article

African diaspora Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Graffiti

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti articles

Hip hop Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

Art or vandalism?

A huge amount of this article is devoted to the notion of graffiti as an artform, and yet the majority of graffiti is criminal juvenile tagging, endlessly repeated, without talent, originality or imagination. Nowhere does the article mention that graffiti is unpopular, and yet it is. A 2014 Yougov poll (for example), conducted in the UK, showed that only 15% of the population actually liked graffiti, whereas 45% of the population positively disliked it, albeit that a slim majority agreed with the (totally irrelevant) postulation that some graffiti could be considered art. It goes without saying that some graffiti could of course be considered art: but unfortunately it's only about 0.001% of it. Surely the unpopularity of graffiti should be mentioned?

Graffiti in Wikipedia itself

Would it perhaps make sense to mention the form of inserting non-content-related entries into Wikipedia articles (vandalism) as a kind of modern graffiti in the chapter on "Modern Experimentation"? As Wiki(gra)ffiti, so to speak, "Wikifitti". Spezi91 (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, typo: "Wikiffiti" Spezi91 (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite sources for this? See WP:OR. 162 etc. (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 162 etc.,

I noticed the term "Wikiffiti" was coined in 2008 by Matt Mechtley (see: Citation needed - Wikipedia) as a form of sticker art in the real world:

e.g.:

[1]https://boingboing.net/2008/01/02/wikiffiti-stickers-t.html

[citation needed] | Know Your Meme

.

But the term "Wikipedia graffiti" was used, for example here:[2]https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/have-you-seen-american-airlines-ceo-doug-parkers-wikipedia-page.html in the way of a modification of a Wikipedia article. Examples could also found in social media, like Twitter (X) with the search of "Wikipedia graffiti" or #Wikiffiti ...

Therefore, one or both of these could be considered to see if they can be usefully integrated into the article or if they are irrelevant to the reader.

Best regards, Spezi91 (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that the sources you've cited here are particularly reliable. See WP:SOURCES 162 etc. (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient graffito

Hello all! I have seen there is an article called Graffito (archeology) which discusses ancient graffiti. I think a lot of information from this page could be moved over to that one, and summarised over here - what is everyones thoughts on this? -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2024

Pizza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.127.18.77 (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2024

Pizza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.108.207 (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

CHANGE: trains were covered in graffiti (1973). TO: train covered in graffiti (1973).

The original caption states that "trains were covered in graffiti"; implying all trains (since 'train(s)'), used to be (since 'were') covered in graffiti. The photo shows one singular train covered in graffiti and does not cite any sources stating that every single train in NYC was covered in graffiti in 1973; which was allegedly since removed. ParanormaI (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you were able to complete this yourself. Thanks for fixing the caption! Marking as answered. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]