User talk:Fourthgeek

FNORD

Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 17:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The Country Wife

Oh, no, intrigue redirected to the Oldsmobile Intrigue? LOL. Thanks very much for fixing that, and reverting vandalism to boot! Bishonen | talk 22:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Sea Ice

I believe the word should have been left as "calve" - a process for pieces of ice to break off in analogy with a cow having calves

I thought the figures were OK as they were.

Pdn 02:36, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

You're right about the calve part, I changed that back. I think the images are better organized this way though. Side-by-side is better than top-on-bottom, for these purposes, I think. If other people agree with you, though, or if someone makes something better, then I'll gladly let it change back to the other way, but they are "tall" pictures, and so it makes more sense to put them side-by-side, for space efficiency and aesthetics.Fourthgeek

Sure - thanks for the fix on calving. Kind of more holistic than caving in a way. So far as the figures go they seem OK either way. Pdn 04:07, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Did you make crafty bits for oblivion?

And do you have Google talk, MSN or AIM?

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Portal (tv).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Portal (tv).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:David Bowman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Bowman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. +Angr 20:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Portal (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portal (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)