User talk:Pepsidude

what is your source for Mr. Greeler? Michael Ward 21:00, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

My information for Mr. Greeler is from one of the Uncle John's Bathroom Readers, I'm not sure which one. I can look it up if you really need to know.

A tag has been placed on From Yesterday, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Haddaway (album)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Haddaway (album), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Haddaway (album) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Haddaway (album), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 03:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Haddaway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Haddaway.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew W.K.

I took a shot at cleaning it up. It seems 90% of the info on there comes directly from the bio on his site. I suspect he's mostly responsible. Anyway I hacked it up. If you feel my work was sufficient please remove the clean up tag that you posted. If not, leave a comment on the talk. Thanks for attention. Wwwhatsup (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Songs Of Life.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Songs Of Life.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Done. Wwwhatsup (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]