User talk:Renamed user 8dk27shaj9

Political Compass - I come up as -7, -6. Just thought I'd share that. Secretlondon 21:38, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Weren't you a computer newbie once? Pandini

Batty boy

... is actaully a Jamaican term that got used a lot when I worked there several years ago. I'll add more to the article when I'm not at work, but just thought I'd let you know. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 16:09, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Survey

There is a survey regarding a disputed paragraph in the PNAC article that you might be interested in. Kevin Baas | talk 19:10, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)

VfD

Please do not remove VfD tags. --fvw * 15:13, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base

Hello. I have read one comment you added on a vfd notice. And indeed it looks like we could put evrything on the WikiPedia. This is deceptive! Technically one can but... WP is an encyclopedia, and not everything is encyclopaedic. For example, I have a cat for the last 14 years. Well, this is all true and verifiable, but it is not encyclopaedic and therefore must not be the topic of an article. For example the square next to my house is named "Green Square". Well.. this all true and verifiable and could be known by some people, but still with no other notable aspects, it would be catastrophic to create an article with such a common name. It would be less bad but still very dumb to create "Green Square (my_city)" with such a no-content... content !

Take time to think about that aspect. We could actually name it vanity. Because I know something does not mean it's worth an article. I always wonder is there a general aspect to something before wondering whether to make an article.

I write all that, because ignorance of Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base leads to enormous amount of work for many people, can span across months of disputes and most important: add nothing to WP.

If I may suggest one thing, sail a good bit in Votes for deletion to get a feeling of the do's and don't. :-)

So, nice meaningful, encyclopaedic, notable, verifiable, edits to you ! :-)

WP is not a catch-all knowledge base.

Gtabary 18:27, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The Independent.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, The Independent.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Please read carefully about rules of using images in Wikipedia:Copyrights. In particular, regarding Image:Scissoralbum.jpg please read Wikipedia:Fair use. You did not indicate the reasons of fair use and source of the image. mikka (t) 14:55, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wordperfect12.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Wordperfect12.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

re: CBHQ

I can send you the old content. Do you have an email address where you would like me to send the old version? Please remember that even though deleted, it is still covered under the Gnu Free Distribution License. Rossami (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sent. Rossami (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ICI.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:ICI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:CheshamTrafficBlackspots.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:CheshamTrafficBlackspots.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UK supermarkets

Nice one with the template, could you find a way of putting Lidl and the co-op on it as well, as both have a significant number of outlets?

Sainsbury's edit

When adding "has been criticised for being vague" or something similar you have to provide a reference. Otherwise it just sounds like you think its vague.

Also you changed "in an effort" to "in what is claimed to be an effort". You seem to be suggesting Sainsbury's had another motive? Why is so hard to believe a profit seeking organisation would like its customers to spend more money? Mark83 19:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean, that it sounded like it was simply a philanthropic effort to improve the lives of their customers? Maybe something like "in an effort to make consumers venture into purchasing more varied products (and hence increase spending)." Mark83 19:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. The problem is it IS your opinion. It's also very selective – you've selected one of the simplest ideas (and yes a well known one). If you want to put that in to be fair and accurate you would also have to put in that there are hundreds of recipe ideas, some of which are not commonplace. Mark83 19:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Disturbing

Template:Disturbing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. riana_dzast a 16:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kensington palace

The copy of the picture on my computer here is about 1800 by 1200. It was scanned from a 6x4 print. I'm not sure how to check whether the wiki copy is the same, short of downloading it again, but I imagine it is the same. What resolution were you after? Sandpiper 23:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kidabear.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kidabear.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Charlie Brooker.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charlie Brooker.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 11:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CheshamMosque.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CheshamMosque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 20:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PiL - Compact Disc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PiL - Compact Disc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gman routekanal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gman routekanal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Old Waitrose Logo.png

Thank you for uploading Image:Old Waitrose Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Capital One Card.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Capital One Card.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JLPlogo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:JLPlogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoeBaldwinPhotoForUserPage.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JoeBaldwinPhotoForUserPage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Scissoralbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Scissoralbum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ifco tray

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ifco tray. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifco tray. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ifco tray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ifco tray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifco tray(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barclays Visa Electron.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barclays Visa Electron.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 23:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JoeBaldwin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JoeBaldwin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]