Talk:Ash

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Also the character name of a popular kids T.V. show, Pokemon.

I'd suggest Ash tree. -- CYD

Removed entries for places in the United States

I removed many redlinked entries for towns in the United States in an attempt to follow the Manual of Style for Disambiguation Pages. The entries I removed were linked only from this disambiguation page, and the linked county articles for those entries did not mention the towns and therefore provided no further information about them. Propaniac (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names back here?

Does anyone else think we should put given and surnames back into this disambig page? --Knulclunk (talk) 01:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As there has been no response, I will proceed.--Knulclunk (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seperate Names

I see that names has been split off from Ash. Why would we want this? It causes a double step for every bad Ash link, hindering the purpose of a disambiguation page. --Knulclunk (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the problem is that you recently merged the name pages into the disambiguation page. That's not the (currently) proper procedure. I only noticed because you made several mistakes in templating.
--William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only procedure for editors familiar with Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy. An "as per WP:WPNAMES" linking to that project in your comments could have helped. The biggest offender is Ash Ketchum who is most frequently linked as just Ash. Let's restore it to your version for now. --Knulclunk (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Back when we started splitting the name definitions from the disambiguation pages in 2006, we always left the notable names behind. But the consensus changed, and now they move the name links, too. It's just a simple extra step for disambiguating, not a big deal.
--William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nutrient

What is the ash that's listed as a nutrient?129.133.206.180 (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soot

What's the difference? Maybe add a link and brief explanation in the see also section 80.189.85.4 (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An issue with volcanic ash

The inclusion of volcanic ash here is problematic, since this article discusses ash as solid residue from burning something. Volcanic ash has a hot source, but nothing actually burns to produce it; it's just a result of fragmenting magma or rock. I'm sort of inclined to move it to See Also, since it's sort of the odd one out among the other forms of ash listed here, but I'd like to hear feedback. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ash (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great information in French

It would be great if someone can expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. That page looks great, but I don’t know French.

[1]

--Dustfreeworld (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy metals

In the article:

“High levels of heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, cadmium, and copper were found in the ash debris” of wildfire.

However, for ash derived from wood and plant matters , there’s almost no mention of heavy metals. If natural wood ash really doesn’t contain much heavy metals, then where do the “high levels of heavy metals” in wildfire ash come from? This article will need addition of this content, supported by sources. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]