It is not accurate that I only later "got around to reading" what I'd been reverting. I was aware Rex was involved in formatting changes, which is why I found Neutrality's edit summary that "rv - Rex, you don’t have the authority to arbitrarily deem POV and remove material" [1] to be entirely disingenuous. (This strongly suggested to me that it was Neutrality who was not paying attention.) There were three changes made - the header section alteration, the changing of the title of the section, and the changing of the image size. No material was deemed POV and removed. I had no particular opinion on the changes in question, but the reason given for undoing another user's edits was invalid (and a characteristic pattern with Neutrality is just reverting without bothering to look at the text), so I assumed Rex made them in good faith and restored them. The section formatting is a pretty minor issue; I don't see it as an extremist "anti-Kerry" edit to shift around the indentation of headings. Furthermore, formatting errors are trivial to adjust and not justification for going on a revert rampage. VV 08:20, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
