Talk:U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Business: Accounting High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

"others have criticized"

The following is currently in the article:

"Others have criticized the SEC for taking an overly rule-based and enforcement-focused approach to regulation, rather than an approach that emphasizes industry-wide safety and learning and thus ensures the reliability of the national securities trading system.^[1]"

unclear general criticism by unnamed "others", sourced to a single post by a "A boutique research and consulting firm focusing on issues of risk and complexity" seems to fall afoul of WP:RS WP:WEASEL and others. If no one objects + improves it, I will remove it after the weekend. Hydromania (talk) 17:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

removed. Note that it's a primary source. If you want to improve it and add it back, go ahead but note wp:weight Hydromania (talk) 00:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Preventing Crashes: Lessons for the SEC from the Airline Industry". January 6, 2015. Retrieved January 6, 2015.

Allen Stanford

The paragraph about Allen Stanford was added by user ChidemK who would seem to have a connection to the author of the source used, Chidem Kurdas. see here. As it doesn't seem to be a very good source, I'm moving it here. Feel free to improve it.

"A similar but even worse failure occurred in the case of Allen Stanford, who sold fake certificates of deposit to tens of thousands of people, many of them working-class retirees. In 1997 the SEC's own examiners spotted this fraud and warned about it. But the enforcement division would not pursue Stanford despite repeated warnings by SEC examiners over the years. ^[1] After the Madoff fraud emerged, the SEC finally took action against Stanford in 2009."

Hydromania (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Kurdas, Chidem. Political Sticky Wicket: The Untouchable Ponzi Scheme of Allen Stanford.

Move/rename proposal

The article should be moved/renamed to Securities and Exchange Commission (United States). This is the naming convention followed by other entities (see Securities and Exchange Commission_(disambiguation). --Senator2029 “Talk” 20:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I was inclined to agree, but their name is actually U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. see their logo on this page and at [sec.gov]. Securities and Exchange Commission (Nigeria) seems to be called SEC Nigeria, as does Securities and Exchange Commission (Philippines). Securities and Exchange Commission (Bangladesh) and Securities and Exchange Commission (Poland) should probably be renamed. It's even in their abbreviation. Hydromania (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hydromania talk UTC 66.8.7.77 (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sidebar heading above seal was also vandalized and requires correction. Change "S Housekeepers" to "Securities" in sidebar above image of seal. 73.37.241.242 (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 20:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Securities and Exchange Commission (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EX99_1 MMS

What is going on with minerals and Minnesota mining and manufacturing IBM Mainframe at Wells Fargo.ES is Einsteinium atomic number 99. U is uranium atomic number 92. Both very radioactive. I previously worked at WellsFargo US Treasury department as software developer of IBM and other systems for wires transfer MTS and I find tables are cross-referenced in Cobol with xref like this is bad MSDS datasheets. They cross reference many tables, Holiday, Currency, COID internal ABA, BBK supression, ART table in wire transfer. Early Warning systems turned on at all? It is not to be used illegally in mining data or minerals. Help llease address this. 170.62.21.151 (talk) 20:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 19, 2024 - [citation needed]

Article has unverified content. Lamia-Scale (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Preventing Crashes: Lessons for the SEC from the Airline Industry". January 6, 2015. Retrieved January 6, 2015.

[2] Kurdas, Chidem. Political Sticky Wicket: The Untouchable Ponzi Scheme of Allen Stanford.

[1]

[1]