This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles

Folklore

This category falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles

comments from 2005

Is there a way I can refer to Category:Scottish folklore as a link in the introductory sentence, without making this a sub-category of Scottish folklore as a side effect? — B.Bryant 23:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

English Folklaw - Best in the World, Eddie.--Crestville 23:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cornish Folklore

I think that Cornish Folklore articles shouldn't really be in the English Folklore category for two reasons:

Cornwall though 'usually' considered part of England has it's own distinct culture and thus folklore. Cornish folklore is more akin to Welsh and Irish...etc.. folk traditions than to English folk traditions.

Most folklorists consider Cornish traditions separate from English traditions, this is not a British folklore category but an English one.

Again though considered to be from a part of England, the Cornish people are of their own ethnic group and thus their folklore should be treated as an appendage of their ethnicity.

Any opinions? Sigurd Dragon Slayer

Robin Hood category paradox?

Robin Hood→Robin Hood figures→Fictional gentleman theives→Robin Hood? The cycle goes on like that. Should someone fix that? Sikovin (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]