Jump to content

Talk:Environmentally friendly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Spotlight

[edit]

Header Section

[edit]

Possible Sources

[edit]

Labels

[edit]

The websites given are not good enough for the source - do google searches and try to get some info - remember to cite!

North America

[edit]
  • USA:
    • Green Seal

Oceania

[edit]

Asia

[edit]

Possible Sources

[edit]

[1]

Methods

[edit]

Pest control section

[edit]
Possible Sources
[edit]

Waste Management section

[edit]
Possible Sources
[edit]

[2]

Clean Tech

[edit]
Possible Sources
[edit]

Useless article

[edit]

This article is titled "environmentally friently". All regulators and standards organizations recommend NOT using this vague term. It is only used (and abused) in advertising. Should this article be deleted? Rlsheehan (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we are to keep this article, it should be limited to the first sections that discuss the limitations of the term "ennvironmentally friendly". The Methods section tries to add validity to a term already invalidated. I have thus removed Methods. Rlsheehan (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting point you bring up here, Rlsheehan. Do you have a source for this info that it is not recommended to use? I am trying to improve the quality of the eco-friendly dentistry page. It is very hard to write about it in a neutral point of view, and I would like to establish context for the term. --Asktheboh96 (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to make our world a better place!!!

This is an important term and Environmentally friendly should be kept. It is important that people know it is an intentionally misused term and it is a form of Greenwashing. It should not be deleted. Rhstafursky (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Environmentally friendly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Environmentally friendly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 15

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 September 2022 and 14 November 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Halfrated, Alliee.bates, M.kayps, Zemra5349, Marissaliberi (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jialeijiang (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oceania Addtion

[edit]

The information is pretty outdated an bare and there are now more articles on the topic, so it should be easy to add some additional information. The current sections consists of only two sentence and is backed up with four sources. Halfrated (talk) 15:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


What?

[edit]

Question to the assignees: What do you personally think you added in terms of "environmental friendliness"? I'll tell you my impression: Almost nothing at all. Simply listing the environmental problems in the global regions and repeating words doesn't cut it. The overall result is, frankly, not good. Wonder what your supervisor had to say about this. -- Kku (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Environmentally_friendly&oldid=1253220413"