Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not pron
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Obvious ad for a porn site Terrace4 03:52, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Background: Notpron was inspired by an earlier site, [http:/thisisnotporn.com/ thisisnotporn]. I have (tried to) play both and I can attest that they are not pornographic. They are multimedia puzzles. It's also my understanding that MIT has similar, but larger-scale games each year. Gazpacho 04:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I created the page, and it's not an ad for a porn site - click on the link, it's a really neat riddle game that's quite popular right now. Google "not pron" and you'll see it. Also, check out memepool - it's on the top of their list right now. --Tommertron 04:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it's not pornography. But it's not really an encyclopedia article either. I don't see any way to verifiably expand past the current sub-stub. The parent site, deathball.net, has an erratic Alexa ranking and I can't find anything independent on the puzzle itself. Delete but without prejudice against re-creation if/when this truly becomes a verifiable web-phenomenon. Rossami (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, Tommertron, for mistaking it for a porn site. However, I tend to agree with Rossami, that it remains not notable. Please convince me that I'm wrong about that, too. :) Terrace4 04:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this advert, but if there are more URL-guessing games besides notpr0n and the earlier thisisnotporn.com, then that could be a subject for an article, although not just a list of exlinks. Gazpacho 05:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- And indeed there are others: hack.net and plime.net, and a site somewhere at Google that they use to find smart job candidates. Gazpacho
- Also The Python Challenge. Sorry I created a stub with this - I thought that it was in interesting game and it looked like it was gaining popularity - I was hoping that some others in the know would expand a bit on the background of the game, as it seemed pretty novel. I still vote to not delete it, or possibly create a category for this type of game. --70.25.23.59 12:27, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... do you suppose an article containing all of these riddle sites is a good idea? Then perhaps we could merge and redirect. Nestea 15:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it deserves to be merged somewhere. There was also that google ad with a puzzle which lead to a website. --cesarb 23:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I like the merge and redirect idea, and am changing my vote. Terrace4 23:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above, good idea. Radiant_* 08:18, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
I think the Merge is a good idea, but I've been racking my brain to figure out a common name for these types of games, that people might actually look up. What do you think, "URL Guessing Games"? "Web Based Puzzles."? --Tommertron 22:33, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "URL Puzzles"? Nestea 14:10, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I say "Web based puzzles" or "Online puzzles" or the like. We could include stuff like Crimson Room and puzzles like it... - fiveless 04:48, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.