Talk:Cave of the Patriarchs

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cave of the Patriarchs article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 365 days

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Religion: Interfaith High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Palestine High‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam High‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Israel High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

Judaism High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of Palestine#Palestine from the Byzantines to the Ottomans|conquest]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 September 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In this phrase:

described the great jealousy with which the Muslims guard the sanctuary

Please change "guard" to "guarded", because this is speaking of events 160 years ago. Obviously the control situation described here was long ago replaced by what's described in the "Israeli control" section. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Word order in first sentence

situated 30 kilometres (19 mi) south of Jerusalem in the heart of the Old City of Hebron in the West Bank

Is there some particular significance to the precise sequence of words here? In general, we put a broader country location earlier in the introduction sentence, and while NPOV and the political issue makes it harder with this topic, we could still do better.

situated in the heart of the Old City of Hebron in the West Bank, 30 kilometres (19 mi) south of Jerusalem

Wouldn't this be better? The primary reason for mentioning Jerusalem is to give a vague sense of its location to readers who are poorly aware of the region's geography, but it's not critical. The critical bit — where it's located, both specifically (Hebron) and regionally (West Bank) — ought to go before the vague-sense bit. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leading phrasing in first paragraph

Last sentence in first paragraph makes a note regarding the historicity of the patriarchal narratives. Similar comments are made in other related entries. Concern is with the word "most". The language leads the reader to believe that a comprehensive survey of Historians was performed and the conclusion is that at least 51% of them hold this opinion.

Propose changing this word to "many," where the citations are some of those historians who support this view.

Even better would be a brief section (or link) to a survey of academic views regarding the historicity of the patriarchs and the patriarchal narratives. Trawls-nit (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bordeaux

There is a spelling mistake in the mention of the "pilgrim of Bordeaux". Bordeaux is wrongly spelled "Bordaux". 1899Vic (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fixed. Feline Hymnic (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the first paragraph, it references most historians dismiss as mythology. But the statement is subjectively untrue. The word most should be changed to some as this would be more accurate. Digimes (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. M.Bitton (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mention on the historicity of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob

Including a sentence that alludes to the fact that most historians believe Abraham, Isaac and Jacob being mythological seems unnecessary, given that adherents of the Abrahamic faiths believe them not to be historical. 87.208.30.220 (talk) 11:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I am requesting that the statement made,”most historians believe the story of Abraham, Isaac, and and Jacob is mythological,” be remove from this page. The statement is inaccurate conjecture based on someone’s opinion and personal religious beliefs. I hold a Masters in Divinity from Liberty University and have never heard a credible scholar argue the historical authenticity of the patriarchal accounts. 2601:582:8500:2370:59EB:AAA6:2680:1119 (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The sentence is supported by 2 references. Please provide reliable sources for the change you want to be made. Your personal experiences are not reliable, see WP:OR. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

700 years?

Are there any actual historical documents that show that the Cave was forbidden to Jews for 700 years and that was actually enforced? I've seen other examples of purported rules that are contradicted by historical sources, and this one seems to be supported only by popular tales. Mcdruid (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this contradicts the more complicated story set out earlier in the article. The source is clearly non-WP:RS (and pretty POV). It gives its own source as "The Jewish community of Hebron" plus, yes, Wikipedia! I'll take out that part of the sentence. Johnbod (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod Can you clarify what you think contradicts? As far as I can see, the latest Jewish entry into the cave mentioned on this page is Benjamin of Tudela, who would have entered in 1170 CE. Jacob ben Netanel haKohen (c. 1175) was also able to access it after paying a large bribe, and Maimonides entered at least partway in 1165. Samuel ben Samson accessed the first cave in 1210. But all of these are more than 700 years before Goren got there in 1967. Starting with the Chronicle of Florence (c. 1315) Jewish sources report that Jews were only allowed to stand at a certain spot partway up a staircase from which once could peer into the building through a window, apparently the same spot used into the British period. Both Christian and Jewish travelers were turned away equally—see Christian Travels in the Holy Land by Michael Ish-Shalom. GordonGlottal (talk) 03:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a) the source used was clearly non-RS, b) 1315 is (a bit) too late for "700", and c) we lack proper referenced sources that the various restrictions were continuous over a period of many centuries and changes of regime. Johnbod (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 1315 report is that they weren't allowed in; the latest recorded Jewish entry is 1210. So 757 years before Goren. Similarly for Christians, Burchard of Mount Sion visited the cave c. 1280 but Philippus Brusserius c. 1350 reports that Christians are already not allowed. Acre fell in 1291; if access was cut off then, that's 676 years. There are consistent reports for the entire period. In the 15th century, for example, Obadiah of Bertinoro and Meshullam of Volterra both confirm that Jews are banned. This subject is discussed generally in Ish Shalom pp. 100-101. Anyway the "about 700 years" previously on this page seems pretty accurate. GordonGlottal (talk) 03:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By all means write that up (the bits not there already) with proper referencing - and perhaps a measure of caution. The "reports for the entire period" may be consistent, but as you have presented them they are extremely spotty. In no other area of history would we be happy to assume that a situation described at a particular date remained the case 200 or more years later. Johnbod (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen similar claims of such bans, but then have run across stories where the ban is not enforced or seems to have been forgotten. I can't remember the specific instance though.

The point is that a blanket claim is likely wrong: did the mosque have a guard in front of it the whole seven centuries? Mcdruid (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, it is in regard to the Temple Mount Talk:Temple Mount/Archive 5. Although the Wikipedia article still claims that "the Ottoman authorities continued the policy of prohibiting non-Muslims from setting foot on the Temple Mount" The source, as I point out, is poor to non-existent.

And that is not considering the habit of humans to break laws: "Despite rabbinical decrees prohibiting access to the [Temple Mount] mountain and the death penalty threat for any Jew caught on the mountain, the deep-seated Jewish attachment to the Temple Mount remained strong. An unknown number of Jews ascended the mountain surreptitiously during these centuries. No records were kept of these visits because of their clandestine nature, but occasional references in Muslim court records and travelers' accounts give evidence of their occurrence" https://www.meforum.org/3556/temple-mount#_ftnref35 Mcdruid (talk) 08:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]