Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Toll

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 02:06, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Albert Toll

With 84 google hits [1], does this pass "the test"? GRider\^talk 23:42, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:03, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep the founders of the largest tranport companies in every pair of countries. Kappa 04:01, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, can't agree with that criteria for notability. Unless the individual has notability beyond founding a company (for instance, the Kelloggs are noted for a health agenda beyond their company, or Bill Gates not only founded a company, but is considered by many to have kicked off the PC boom (and the buggy software boom)), I don't think they are necessarily notable. I am interested to see what the consensus is, however! HyperZonk^talk 17:55, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Easily passes the bar for notability. ElBenevolente 01:08, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. The company he founded has 17,000 employees and turnover of nearly $4 billion Australian dollars. [2] He was also the local mayor in the Newcastle area of Australia 5 times and is generally recognised as a notable Novocastrian. [3] Capitalistroadster 01:38, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep founders of large companies. DaveTheRed 07:35, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Concur with Hyperzonk, delete. Radiant! 10:13, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
Keep - David Gerard 01:26, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep - this one isn't even marginal. --iMb~Mw 12:35, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Very notable. Xezbeth 17:45, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.