Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvonne Monet
Appearance
Though I'm a bit uncomfortable nominating someone who works in the same industry that I do, this is just vanity, pure and simple. Sorry, Yvonne...but ya gotta go. - Lucky 6.9 17:30, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
concur. delete. --Terrapin 17:35, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Yvonne Monet - you are the weakest link. Goodbye. Ianb 17:45, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity pages are why God invented Friendster. Diberri | Talk 18:14, Jul 28, 2004 (UTC)
- I hate to say this to anyone who has already suffered the indignity and punishment of living in Newman, GA, but delete for vanity. Geogre 18:51, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I agree that the vanity stuff must go. However, she is a well-established and well-known DJ, and surely has other information about her what would be worthy of an article. Essentially, I agree only with the deletion of the vanity content, but not completely squashing the entire article itself. –radiojon 21:12, 2004 Jul 28 (UTC)
- Vanity in its purest sense. Delete. If she deejays (I think that's the verb) for some radio station and it has an article, by all means add her name there. I considered deactivating the links, but this seems more like vanity than advertising. --Ardonik 06:03, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)