Jump to content

Talk:Ventricle (heart)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is

[edit]

Is this page necessary? I don't think so: There are articles for right ventricle and left ventricle, and the heart article discusses ventricles in general. -- DavidWBrooks 19:02, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I'd say the best thing to do is to move R) and L) ventricle to this page, remove repeated information, and make R) & L) redirect here. Tristanb 18:55, 9 Sep 2003 (EDT)

Especially as it is so poorly written. The first paragraph should be discarded entirely and written correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.201.140.155 (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[reply]
The above no longer applies.

Ventricle (heart) had been a redirect page to heart, but it was re-written today as a brand new article. Right ventricle and left ventricle now redirect to here instead of going to heart. -- PFHLai 16:10, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)

File:Cardiac Cycle Left Ventricle.PNG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Cardiac Cycle Left Ventricle.PNG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Something is wrong with the right ventricular chamber sizes. The size given for RVEDD and RVESD are equal. I do not know the correct dimensions but this CANNOT be correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.57.48.14 (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Human or other?

[edit]

It's not always clear which parts of this refer to humans, and which to others. Can someone review and clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.217.247 (talk) 19:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Ventricular pressure

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. PriceDL (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Readily merged, needless separation. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.