Talk:January 19
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
|
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box. |
More anniversaries:
|
Notability of SCUD attack on Israel
[edit]I question the notability of:
This was the second attack on Israel by Iraq. The first attack occurred on January 18 resulting in 7 minor injuries. This attack resulted in 15 minor injuries. In general, these attacks do not seem notable, but at the very least it seems if the beginning of hostilities between nations, no matter what, is notable, then the entry belongs on January 18. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
An attack by one nation on another using long-range ballistic missiles is a notable event regardless of how many injuries it causes and whether it is the 1st or third or 14th. If it happened in your neighborhood, would you be so eager to dismiss it? Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Is it notable every time it occurs? If it happened every day for 30 days, should we list it on every day? There is also a listing on January 22. Your statement above makes me think that you may have a conflict of interest with the topic and thus your impression of its notability might be skewed. These attacks did not prompt a response from Israel. They had no discernible long term impact. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 17:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
The lack of response from Israel makes these events more notable, not less. If Israel had responded in kind, this would, in terms of the long term and bigger picture, have been in Sadam Hussein's favor. Maybe you have a conflict of interest yourself, which is why you are so eager to suppress these historical facts. And you have not answered my question: If a rocket from another country traveled hundreds of miles and caused injuries and damages in your neighborhood, would you be so eager to suppress the fact and dismiss its importance because injuries were few, and/or that sort of thing had happened before? Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- If a missile from another country landed in my back yard the day after another one landed in my neighbor's backyard and no one was killed or seriously injured, it would not be a globally notable event that warrants placement on this list. If the first missile landing in my neighbor's backyard had a significant impact on an ongoing or new conflict, it would belong here. If it had no impact, it too would not belong here. I am not trying to suppress historical facts. The date articles are not a place to list every event that occurs. Would you consider listing only the first attack on January 18? -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
At the very least, we should include the first SCUD attack, the last one, and the one that caused the most casualties. Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit request on 1 December 2012
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- 1974 – Walter Jones, American football player
79.255.122.90 (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also, what happened to Walter Jones in 1974 on this date? Request needs to be formatted as "add ____ because _____" not just as you have. gwickwiretalkedits 19:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Births and Deaths cleanup
[edit]In accordance with the guidelines, I've started weeding the Births and Deaths sections by removing entries for celebrities with 0-4 articles in other languages. Where possible, these have been transferred to the relevant Year in Topic articles. As well as making the lists more manageable, this will help with the globalization effort.Deb (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Deb: Is it normal that your edit appeared on Special:PendingChanges? I thought admins had their changes reviewed automatically. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:08, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- It appears not. But I guess there's no reason I shouldn't be subject to oversight, just like anyone else. Deb (talk) 08:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Deb and L293D: If there are existing pending changes queued for an article, all subsequent edits will be captured as pending changes unless the editor chooses to also Accept the pending edits (assuming they have that ability). "Live" edits can't be published to an article while other edits are pending, because the edit history is linear. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- It appears not. But I guess there's no reason I shouldn't be subject to oversight, just like anyone else. Deb (talk) 08:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Canadian Football League
[edit]OTD 1958 the Canadian Football League was officially founded. [1]
birthday of Poe under holidays
[edit]this was only ever one person, and it has stopped. It is not a holiday or observance in the sense of this section. delendum est. --142.163.195.24 (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)