Talk:Ministry of Commerce (China)

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Untitled

There is a dispute between two versions. To see the other version: [1], to compare: [2]. — Insta ntnood 05:17, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

PRC/Mainland

This is a government ministry post of the PRC. Which is why I have placed the article in the PRC category and moved it from the mainland China category. SchmuckyTheCat 01:42, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Jurisdiction of this ministry is only within the mainland. — Insta ntnood 03:27, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

- your mom has jurisdiction only in my pants. that is baloney, and i guess I have to add informtion about CEPA and An Min SchmuckyTheCat 04:47, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

CEPA is a bilateral agreement between two trade entities. — Insta ntnood 05:06, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

trilateral actually. across HK, the mainland, and Macau, which constitutes all of the PRC. SchmuckyTheCat 05:13, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No. There are two bilateral agreements, one between Hong Kong and the mainland, and the other between Macao and the mainland. — Insta ntnood 05:16, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

with the goal of integration of all three, the idea of which you cannot stand. If you're going to add controversy tags to edits you don't like, then so, what, exactly is the controversy. Please make a problem statement that other users might wish to comment on. SchmuckyTheCat 05:21, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The goal of CEPAs were to lift trade barriers. It was not agreements which Hong Kong's and Macao's trade departments give up their duty and transfer the power to the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC. — Insta ntnood 05:40, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

the article doesn't say that hong kong and macau give up anything, does it? SchmuckyTheCat 05:48, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please write clearly what the "integration" is if you really want to write about it. — Insta ntnood 05:53, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

instantnood marks major changes as minor edits

reverts and category changes are not minor edits. please do not mark them as such. kthxbye. SchmuckyTheCat 01:43, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ministry of Commerce of the PRC.gif

Image:Ministry of Commerce of the PRC.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080401095016/http://en.chinagate.com.cn:80/english/2069.htm to http://en.chinagate.com.cn/english/2069.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090126194410/http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/ to http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]