Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Iced Tea
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:30, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Probably not verifiable, looks like nonsense. - Evil saltine 01:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete BJAODN Methinks this is less notable than Vodka and Coke Klonimus 04:16, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe it's Magic and Iced Tea? Delete. Radiant_* 08:59, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nonsense. Megan1967 13:28, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no encyclopedic content, no reason to transwiki or to merge to Cocktail. Maybe it's actually Tea and Magic Ice? Barno 14:50, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Ice Tea the collectible card game? Ice Tea the Steeping? Non-encyclopedic. Geogre 23:15, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as unverified. If the contributor can't be bothered to give a single reference to even indicate the existence of this story, I don't know why we should waste much time considering it. Due diligence: only 24 Google hits, and as I write this the top hit is Wikipedia:Votes for Deletion!. NONE of the others are relevant. Most of them are about tea! And a few stray phrases like "hunter:books of magic, iced tea." Dpbsmith (talk) 03:04, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) No, I'm not going to check my library's online catalog to see if they have any of the 43 books by "Deputy Dumbass" and/or "Doctor Rotcod." Dpbsmith (talk) 03:06, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.