Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardgainer (0th nomination)

Dicdef at best. -- Jmabel 21:51, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete! I'd say a dictionary definition is a stretch at that. There is no context given, no references to relevant information. Sounds like something out of South Park. Mud 22:17, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. I have expanded the article a bit, although it still needs work. This is a valid topic which is significant enough to warrant an article. After all there is monthly magazine solely devoted to this topic. -- Popsracer 12:52, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. All google hits point toward ways of parting you from your money. Denni☯ 00:31, 2004 Jun 21 (UTC)
• 13,500 Google hits [1]. Whether or not it's a scam, it seems notable enough. Keep. — Lady Lysine Ikinsile 11:00, 2004 Jun 21 (UTC)
• Keep - it's a niche term, but in active use within the bodybuilding community. Additionally, a well-developed article on the topic could include a medical perspective. - jredmond 11:52, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. As Her Ladyship notes, it's a well-used term; if anyone wants to build up this article (ho ho) there's a "hardgainer FAQ" at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/body-building/hardgainer-faq/ which seems to have a fair bit of useful info in it. -- ChrisO 19:02, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. are we still voting? Vincent Gray 00:10, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)