Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Dickens
Joseph Dickens was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.
- Delete, vanity. Also Dickonian Theory.-gadfium (talk) 07:44, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. If you feel this should have been speedy-deleted, see Wikipedia:Proposal_to_expand_WP:CSD. --Carnildo 08:13, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Not sure this qualifies as speedy, but there's no doubt it needs to see deletee. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:14, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. Likely self-promotion. Not a speedy under current rules though. jni 08:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity - I would vote for speedy. Jeff Knaggs 08:19, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, borderline speedy, abusive vanity. Wyss 22:00, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Regardless of how, please delete this patent vanity page. Edeans 00:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.