Talk:Alessandro Algardi

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Untitled

Could someone please break this into paragraphs?

Restoring some strength

Editing without improving the language, clarifying points or adding new material is the equivalent of fingerpainting. Familiarity with a subject makes the standard, midstream assessments of the community more familiar. Not knowing makes us timid, as is right.

"major rival" of Bernini: What other sculptor in Rome was being thought of when "major" was deleted? François Duquesnoy?
"and an outstanding draughtsman" deleted. Was this deleted because an editor, having assessed Algardi's drawings, found them lacking?
"which gave the young sculptor a chance to immerse himself in one of the great collections..." is just better than the unidiomatic "and exposed the young sculptor a chance to see his large collections" This is just what "fingerpainting" means. The importance of the Mantuan collection is beyond challenge surely, though an editor has substituted merely "large" for "great". Not enough outstanding Antiquities in Duke Ferdinando's collection, is that the issue? Or is it their showy presentation in the famous gallery that is at fault?
"Ludovico Cardinal Ludovisi" is actually the better form. Changing it to "Cardinal Ludovico Ludovisi" amounts to fingerpainting: think of Francis Cardinal Spellman" etc etc. Some other cardinals were known from the title of their see. Familiarity with some literature always helps in these questions.
"Gian Lorenzo Bernini, in the first flush of his fame, had the pick of the best available commissions..." Senselessly deleted, doubtless as a "POV" assertion to the untutored: read a book and gain some feel for 17th century patronage in Rome, please. This is simply history.
Algardi's scultures: "displaying great technical skill" has been deleted by some demanding connoisseur. Isn't Algardi's finesse the point?
"Anthology of sculpture" is the least bit inflated: I have returned to "Some major sculpture".

--Wetman 21:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1) While Algardi may have been a competitor for commissions of Bernini, I sometimes find the word rival unsatisfying. In addition, there were other rivals to Bernini for portraiture (duquesnoy and Finelli) and architecture. I would be open to a modifying term. 2) I find no evidence that Algardi left us with evidence of draughtsmanship. The available drawings by his hand is minimal if any. He was almost exclusively a sculptor. 3) I took the Mantuan collection reference out. It seems to stress the notion that no artists became great without studying old masters. Finally, to say Mantua had one of the "great collections" of Roman antiquity is questionable? Was it top "5" or top "10"? Also I do not know how to compare it to some of the collections in Rome which had some relatively better preserved large pieces such as Farnese Bull or the Laccoon. Ultimately, had Algardi not seen the Mantuan collection, he would have seen even greater collections in Rome. 4) There are editors who object to your structuring of cardinals. I typically choose the terminology that directly brings up text.

I'm not sure of the other points. I would refer you to Haskell's text on baroque Roman patronage.

5) I would not use "flush of fame" as the correlate of Bernini's success. He may have been successful because of talent and/or connections. I would agree that Bernini had extensive papal patronage in the years prior to Ludovisi papacy.

CARAVAGGISTI 06:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alessandro Algardi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]