User talk:Jeffmilner

Welcome. Lotsofissues 00:45, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. --Jeff 01:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Deleting Your Own Page

To delete a page you created add {{db-owner}} to the top of that page and an administrator will come along and delete it. Kershner 18:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Backmasking

Hey, it's the famous Jeff Milner! Nice site, even though I have a feeling a lot of misguided people are using it to "prove" that Zeppelin and other artists backmasked. One suggestion: clear up the distinction between backmasking and backwards messages. The former is, by definition, deliberate, whereas the latter includes, as you say, "coincidental" messages. So the question here is somewhat misleading: "What do you think about backmasking? Is there some evil force, like Satan, that helped create them?" If they were created, it was by the artists, not by Satan.

I also wanted to ask you to help some more with Backmasking, and maybe take a look at List of backmasked messages. What is especially important right now is good references, and I'm sure you've come across some reliable ones in your journeys through the world of backward messages. If you could provide a few good sources, it would be a big help. Thanks, Λυδ α cιτγ 02:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, it's been a long time since I've checked my talk page. Yeah, I'm certainly interested in helping you out. It will probably have to wait until the new year though.--Jeff 01:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever's good for you. At some point, I'm going to clean out and revise both Backmasking and the List of backmasked messages. Λυδαcιτγ 05:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backmasking is up at FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Backmasking. Λυδαcιτγ 18:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Sapper VCs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sapper VCs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sapper VCs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Deuce (2016 series) has been accepted

The Deuce (2016 series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Thomas-mcnabb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas-mcnabb.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas McNabb

Hallo Jeff, if you're starting a new article like this please remember that this is an international encyclopedia, not a local one, and give us a clue about the geographical context. I'm guessing/hoping that the "Lethbridge" you mention is Lethbridge in Alberta (if not, please correct it), but another time please tell us, and link to the article. Also please note that we don't link dates like 1952. Thanks, and Happy Editing! PamD 15:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeffmilner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jeffmilner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Problem with Jon Stewart (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Problem with Jon Stewart (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Initial public offering of Reddit (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Initial public offering of Reddit instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This info should just be a section in the existing Reddit article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Initial public offering of Reddit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeffmilner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]