Talk:Recorder flute
I question the wisdom of moving this article from "the recorder." Wasn't that a better name than "recorder flute"? Yes, it's imperfect--but, I mean, recorders are never called "recorder flutes," or I've never heard them called that! --LMS
That's how it was listed in Music basic topics, so perhaps I just propagated another error. However, "The_Recorder" seems quite stilted to me (and I assume we don't want to start a trend of people adding "The_" on the front of anything that isn't a proper name), and "Recorder" seems too ambiguous. I won't object to anyone coming up with a better one though. ---Alan Millar
- What if we had a "Musical instruments" page (do we?) I'm at work so can only sneak looks here and there... If we did(do) we could have Musical Instruments/Recorder and it would be a bit more to the point. I agree that recorder flute sounds funny. JHK
Yes, we have a musical instruments page. This got started when I was integrating the list of instruments from music basic topics into it. The subpage is not a bad idea, other than the fact that there seems to be a rising revolt against subpages and people seems to be actively eliminating them... --Alan Millar
As there was very little about any other kind of recorder at recorder, and as I couldn't think of a way there ever could be, I've moved the content once here to there. "Recorder flute" is a very rare usage, as far as I know. --Camembert 01:45 Sep 7, 2002 (UCT)
Start a discussion about improving the Recorder flute page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Recorder flute" page.
