Talk:Anagenesis

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emscott3. Peer reviewers: Cnols.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

"It is easy to see from the preceding definition how controversy can arise among taxonomists regarding when the differences are significant enough to warrant a new species classification."

Yeah, especially since the only way to really tell is to grab a time-machine and see if two specimens from different times can produce a fertile offspring... That's gotta cause the occasional fistfight at biology conferences. crazyeddie 09:19, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

"Anagenesis may also be referred to as phyletic evolution or gradual evolution."

It is interesting to note that in micro-evolutionary theory there is considerable discussion regarding the role of how more successful subpopulations(with low interbreeding rates) may displace other subpopulations in the original niche. From this viewpoint (more in line with punctuated equilibria)anagenesis is esssentially speciation which destroys the original specie. A sort of "mosaic speciation" --Avimimus 19:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

This article is pretty poorly written.

1) It repeats itself a lot. It is often fuzzy.

2) The section on humans doesn't offer any real information.

178.39.66.73 (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Anagenic" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anagenic has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15 § Anagenic until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 09:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]