User talk:Oldfarm

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

SS John W. Brown

Nice picture. The copyright looks fine. Gdr 22:27, 2004 Oct 19 (UTC)

You are correct. For some reason I read it as inner harbor on the ship website. It's been changed back. Thanks. --ScottyBoy900Q 22:21, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Liberty Ships

Okay Oldfarm: Finding out the finer points of the merchant marine pictures that I posted is no longer possible due to the passing of the folks who were there. However asking around [ie, my wife, whose father was there] has revealed that he only sailed on Liberty Ships. I have more pictures and if you email me at xxxxx at yahoo.com I can send them to you and we can continue the discussion about what i know [and don't know] . Carptrash 16:50, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

PS I notice your interest in WWII POW camps. There is a German cemetery in Reykjavik, Iceland for POWs that died there, That i had run out of film when I discovered it and don't have pictures, but it might interest you. There might not have been a camp per se, but there is a small cemetery. I also discovered a book in my library "Nazi Prisoners of War in America" by Arnold Krammer that you might not be aware of. I'll see if there are any camps that are not listed in the riolls of camps in the US of A. Carptrash 17:03, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Isetta

Hello- Thanks for your great work on the Isetta page! It's needed it for a while. I've taken a pass through to tidy up some loose ends. Fantastic work! --Milkmandan 02:18, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (military units)

Hi. My watchlist shows that you were interested enough to work on a military-topic article, so I wanted to make sure you were aware of the new Wikipedia:Naming conventions (military units) project, in case you didn't see any of the announcements. — B.Bryant 22:32, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image help

Apparently, the only way to change the name of an image is for you to save it, then re-upload it. Tag the original version with {{delete}}, explaining that you're renaming the image. As for replacing images, I'd suggest simply uploading the new image and calling it Foo2, where Foo was the original image--that way both are preserved. HTH, Meelar (talk) 15:00, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Sorry I didn't get the appropriate info in there for you on the Grumman American AA-1 article. Thanks for your work on it already, it's looking very good! The WikiProject is voluntary, and you don't have to follow the guidelines we use, but I put the aero-stub back for our own reference. I also tend to use stubs a bit liberally, when an article is probably closer to being just incomplete, so some wikipedians would probably jump on me for that.

Anyway, thanks again for your work. I see you used to fly an AA-1 yourself - my father and I are actually looking at perhaps purchasing one this summer. They're beautiful little planes. Have a good one! eric ✈ 04:41, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

Tadley

Thanks for the proofing of History - I was a little tired when I typed it. Oldfarm 12:25, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No worries Oldfarm -- thanks for your additions that have considerably enhanced the article. I may do a little more rearranging of text later (when I'm no longer at work!). Don't know if you've been back to the Tadley area in recent years, but Aldermaston village still looks much the same as it did in the picture on your user page. Tadley, on the other hand, has changed beyond recognition, even since my childhood there in the 70s/80s. It even has a public swimming pool now! --Lancevortex 16:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

RAF Aldermaston

Hi Oldfarm. Actually I wasn't that sure about the name for Aldermaston airfield after your original message but I seem to remember seeing it called RAF Aldermaston somewhere. I think at some time it had Spitfires stationed there but I'm going on memory and don't have any references to hand. BTW, AFAIK all 'US' air bases in the UK were technically known as 'RAF so-and-so' although the 'locals' may not have known them as such. During the expansion at the beginning of WWII the RAF built a considerable number of airfields, intending to have one per-squadron, but when Pearl Harbor occured and the US entered the war the RAF agreed to give-up some of its stations and allow the US to use them. That's why many RAF Bomber Command stations had several squadrons on each airfield. Regards, Ian Dunster 10:54, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oldfarm, I am currently researching Dr. Henry Rainsford Hulme (1908-1991) and I noticed from your user page that you served a formal, five-year engineering apprenticeship at Aldermaston working under Dr. William Penney, Dr Henry Hulme and John Dolphin between 1953-58. I would be grateful if you would be willing to share your memories of your time at Aldermaston and especially any memories that you have regarding Dr. Hulme. My contact information is on my user page. Stephen Shaw 15:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC) User:Stephenshaw83

Image:StirlingCastle195811.jpg

Hi, you need to update this image's information to indicate who the copyright holder is, and what the license is. If you the copyright holder, you can add {{GFDL-self}}. Thanks. --Gmaxwell 11:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Swing Riots

To be very honest with you: I can't explain why Swing Riots is considered a stub. As a participant in the WikiProject Stub sorting, I regularly move articles from Category:Stubs to relevant stub categories. Because I come across so many articles, I don't really have the time to assess the stub tags as such. I only remove stub tags when it's very obvious that the article is not a stub. In other cases, I rely on other users. If they consider an article a stub, and it's not obvious that it's not a stub, I simply follow their judgement. In the case of Swing Riots, User:Talrias was the first to add the stub tag, which was swiftly removed by User:Sn0wflake. That was reverted by Talrias the next day. About 15 minutes after that revert, I came across the article, via Category:Stubs. I simply changed the stub tag to the appropriate tag, which was {{UK-hist-stub}}. Now that I've read the article, I think the {{expansion}} tag is a bit more appropriate than the {{stub}} tag. Aecis ^praatpaal 23:18, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Isetta-iso.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Isetta-iso.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Rossrs 09:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:19450418-Celle-01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:19450418-Celle-01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

In order to keep an image on Wikipedia, it has to be sourced and licensed (See Wikipedia:Image use policy). The image you uploaded is probably not sourced or licensed. If you took the images, that makes it easy. Please put a summary and license on the image. See Image:Lake austin 2005.jpg for an example of how to document. -ThanksNv8200p talk 17:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I confused you. The example I cited was on Wikimedia Commons not Wikipedia. The template "Information_1" only exists on the Commons. That is why it would not work on Wikipedia. I edited your image so your text is displayed and updated the copyright tags. You can look at WP:ICT for more info about the copyright tags. Also, please take a look at Image:19450418-Celle-01.jpg and see if everything is good. Again, I apologize. Now I can use your image as an example to others of how to source and license! -Thanks -Nv8200p talk 15:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Hello there. As to the list of POW camps, frankly speaking I was perfectly happy with the previous version. However, currently there's a widespread notion to blame all German WWII camps exclusively on -more or less mysterious - Nazis. Hence, I moved the article to be consistent with List of concentration camps of Nazi Germany (previously List of German concentration camps and other similar articles. You'd have my support if all were to be moved back BTW. Halibu tt 02:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The March (1945)

The death march article needs to be cleaned up. The term is not "a deliberate attempt to kill some or all of the marchers". Please see Death marches (Holocaust). I simply have no time now, working on' like, 7 artices at the same time. mikka (t) 02:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MEN and Multiple endocrine neoplasia

How about a redirect (or dab) at MEN since that's the correct acronym for Multiple endocrine neoplasia? Gflores ^Talk 02:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the redirect. MEN will now load the Multiple endocrine neoplasia article. Let me know if you have any comments or concerns. :) Gflores ^Talk 02:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Union-Castle Line

Oldfarm, what do the numbers in brackets after some of the ships in the table represent? It's probably obvious to everyone except me :-) -- Ian ≡ talk 02:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Stuart William Palmer

I am curious, what was the reason for flagging this article as "This person is not notable."? Regards Oldfarm 16:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search does not provide any results related to him. A Google search, for just his first and last name[1] shows just one result about this guy and numerous results relating to insignificant Charles Palmers. joturn e r 21:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know a lot

Can I get your e-mail address? I've got several questions to ask about merchant ships used in early WWII (preferably, before Pearl Harbor)? If you want to privately contact me, my e-mail is colmarksman@msn.com. Thanks! Colonel Marksman 03:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC) PS: I'm not sure how many of those articles on ships you wrote or edited, but good job on anything you did![reply]

Tadley

No problem. I think there's scope for more development of this article and those for nearby villages. I can also take some more pictures. Any suggestions welcome. Alan Pascoe 20:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aldermaston

I don't have a picture, but I do intend to take one. The weekend weather hasn't been favourable recently. Regarding your picture, I think it should stay in addition to a new picture. Apart from the gravel road in the foreground, which is now an asphalt road, and the lack of cars, the view has not changed much. I think the two pictures would illustrate well to the reader that Aldermaston changes very little. Alan Pascoe 22:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese POW Camp List

Hello there. I have uploaded two images that may be of use for you on the Japanese WW2 POW camps list. They are high quality maps (including index) listing all of the Japanese camps in the Pacific. Arsonal 04:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gunji Koizumi

Could you take a look at the article you wrote on Gunji Koizumi. If you have the time and inclination Wikipedia prefers a prose style rather than a list. CheersPeter Rehse 10:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pls-logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pls-logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 06:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pls-logo.gif

You're not likely to get a response from Betacommand (or at least not any time soon), he's too busy wasting users' time by tagging fair use logos with his automated script. I have added a fair use rationale for the logo, which you can find here. If you find other logos tagged in the same way, feel free to copy-paste the rationale there (changing, of course, the source information and article name). Lexicon (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Black Pete USMM WWII mascot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Black Pete USMM WWII mascot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 16:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding license of Image:USS Marlin.jpg

Hi, I noticed that you uploaded the image Image:USS Marlin.jpg. If I'm not mistaken you took this picture yourself, and licensed it as public domain. I was wondering if either you or myself (with your permission), could make this image a PD-self, as seen on Template:PD-self. It's really just a formality so that there is no question later on as to the exact license that is use. Thanks for your time and contributions. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 21:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Oldfarm 00:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom Park

Please let me know which usage of the photos you are referring to. Both ships are located at Freedom Park in Omaha, and if its simply the matter of writing an article I will put that together very quickly - however, let me know what you are referring to. Thanks. • Freechild'sup? 02:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mvc-015s.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mvc-015s.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Black Pete USMM WWII mascot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Black Pete USMM WWII mascot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you want - I do not understand the rules any more Oldfarm (talk) 00:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gb red ensign minor.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Gb red ensign minor.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you want - I do not understand the rules any more Oldfarm (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Iso_Isettacarro.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iso_Isettacarro.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I find your message incomprehensible. Do what ever you want. I give in with the barrage of jargon I am receiving. Thank you for driving me away from Wikipedia. It has become more trouble than it is worth. Oldfarm (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rettetast"

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Usmc1936 logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Usmc1936 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you will, I find the instructions at the media copyright questions page. incomprehensible. I give in. Oldfarm (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Partners In Care

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Partners In Care, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.partnersincare.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Partners In Care, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gunji Koizumi

Hello Oldfarm, thank you for your kind comments regarding the Gunji Koizumi article. I am sorry to hear about your health problems. If you have any troubles with critical feedback or image use, as I see from some messages above, feel welcome to ask me if you think I can be of help. I also ran into some of these issues when I first started contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks again for your note. Janggeom (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SS John W. Brown - categories

SS John W. Brown

Can you tell me why the Category:Freighters and Category:Troopships was/were removed from the SS John W. Brown?

Regards, Oldfarm (talk) 01:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message! Because she's in the category Category:Liberty ships, which is itself in both. Hence putting her in all three is over-categorisation. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BloemfonteinCastleProfile.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Oldfarm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BloemfonteinCastleProfile.png

Thanks for uploading File:BloemfonteinCastleProfile.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oldfarm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:StirlingCastle195811.jpg

The file File:StirlingCastle195811.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]