Talk:Lighting design
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Requested move 8 January 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 08:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Lighting designer → Lighting design – Our standard convention appears to be for topics that apply to both a profession and the occupation to be named after the profession. This fits with the WP:BROADCONCEPT guideline, as noted by an editor on Discord, not all productions will have a dedicated lighting designer. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 06:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. We only rarely have articles focused on the professional rather than the profession (e.g. Author, Philosopher), where there is something to say about the qualities of being such a professional distinct from what we have to say about the profession. That is decidedly not the case here. BD2412 T 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.